Categories

Max-Bang Series: Fire Your Receptionist!

Categories: All Training, Syndicated, The Max-Bang Series    Comments: 18

Here’s a great idea that will save you money — fire your receptionist!  OMG!  You have to be kidding me!  If there is one thing that’s as sure as “for sale” signs in this industry, it’s the ever-present receptionist at the local brokerage.  You know the one I’m talking about.  She makes slightly over minimum wage… maybe $8 per hour.  She’s on the payroll for 40 hours per week, with paid vacation and benefits.


The cost to the brokerage is about $370 per week plus benefits when you count the employer FICA, the federal and state unemployment, and the paid vacation.  With benefits, that works out to over $25,000 per year.  Okay, that’s not the end of the world.

I agree.  It would make sense if she were providing an additional $125,000 in value to your operation.  (Payroll costs should be about 20% of revenue as a thumb-rule, so everyone on the payroll should produce five times their cost in value to the company.)  But let’s look at the typical brokerage.

What does the receptionist actually do to provide that $125,000 in value?  She answers the phone and then hands the phone off to the appropriate person because she is neither skilled enough nor experienced enough to actually answer most questions.   And in most real estate companies that position is turning over faster than the agents, a third of whom turn over every year.

What that means is that just about the time she is actually competent to answer the phone, and then look up the appropriate person on her personnel log and transfer the call or (God forbid) take a message (that ultimately falls into a black hole), she has decided to move on to greener pastures.

In the brokerage where I began my real estate career, we had five receptionists during my two-year affiliation.  What’s worse was that hardly a week went by when there wasn’t some personal drama that demanded her immediate attention so she was late, left early, or absent altogether.  Those days, her chores fell on the other staff, making them less efficient.

I determined that when I opened my own company we would not have a receptionist.  It’s now been six years, and I’ve saved $150,000 and untold drama.  But how can I not have a receptionist?  That’s pretty easy actually.  Every agent has his or her own mobile phone, and the agents either advertise those numbers or they advertise the hotline number we provide in their virtual office technology.

My agents own their own signs, so the numbers on the sign are theirs.  Their hotline calls come in, and are routed to them seamlessly, while inserting the caller information into their client manager where they can followup and keep notes.  The agents never miss their calls, and I don’t have to be in the middle.

But what about walk-in business?  I have a sign at the receptionist desk that says if there is nobody at the desk to ring the bell.  (There is never anyone there.)  But you know what?  Someone always gets up and answers the door.  Problem solved.  Let’s face it, desks are cheaper than people.  And desks never call in sick or get involved in office drama.

Those walk-ins are rarely customers by the way — it’s generally the mailman, UPS, or an agent dropping off a contract for an agent.  In six years and in three prominent locations, I’ve had less than a dozen walk-in customers, and all were handled without a receptionist.  Amazing!

So, if you are a broker or if you’re thinking about opening your own brokerage, think about this:  What could you do with an extra $150,000 over the next six years?  I say fire the receptionist and use the money on something that will return value.  Or maybe buy a nice boat and get away for a while!  That’s what I’d do.  And that’s Max-Bang!

Take The Test Drive!

Have you ever wondered what the best system for creating new business from the internet looks like? Want to see it in action? Finally, an interactive demo that allows you to sit in the driver's seat and check out the system that has revolutionized single agent lead generation for the real estate industry. Begin the Test Drive


Matt Jones PhotoMatt Jones is the founder and CEO of FavoriteAgent.com, nationally syndicated columnist, broker, and best selling author of LCM: The Secret to Success in the New Age of Real Estate, The Ultimate Listing Presentation, Traffic: How to Sell Fast and Net More, Becoming a Mega-Producer, The Science of Online Marketing, 10 Steps to Real Estate Success, 20 Questions: Everything You Always Wanted to Know about Real Estate but Were Afraid to Ask, The Virtual Office Model, Max-Bang!, and The NEW Ultimate Listing Presentation. Jones' North Carolina-based company has been profiled by major media outlets as an innovator and a pioneer in the industry, and CNN's Pulse on America claimed FavoriteAgent.com is "changing the way real estate is being done in America." This article is syndicated in the following locations: iTunes, YouTube, Stitcher Radio, BlogMattBlog.com, RealBlogging.com, NewsGeni.us, TheCommissionCheck.com, RevampedAgent.com, and now Amazon Kindle.

Latest Comments (18)


Archived Comments

  1. Sheila Pulford Apr 5, 2010

    Good article. However, you assume all receiptions are female. You are behind the times. Also with mailman…it’s now postal worker. I’m not a bra-burning female, but in these times we need to be politically correct.

    • Matt Jones Apr 5, 2010

      Sheila,

      Would you believe me if I told you that I knew that I’d get called out on that one? I actually did. But for the sake of literary value, I went with a singular gender (as opposed to his or her). I figured even in this highly liberated time that the odds still favored the females.

      Thanks for reading, and for your note. Is it hot in Phoenix yet? I went to first grade in Phoenix and have visited many times — I love Phoenix! Only problem is there is no ocean!

  2. I like mailmen and female receptionists : >) I’m afraid a postal worker might go postal on me.

    • Matt Jones Apr 5, 2010

      I may have started something here! Oh no!

  3. Laura Coffey Apr 5, 2010

    There is company out here that has a male receptionist and he is great. Unfortuantely he is not at my company. Though I agree with your concept of a receptionist I don’t think it applies to all companies. Here at our Re/Max our company is huge and we attract buyer’s & seller’s from all over the world. They aren’t contacting one agent., they want a Re/Max agent. A receptionist is there to answer the phones and walk in leads that come in. Whoever is on floor gets the lead. I don’t want to knock you but I’m thinking you don’t need a receptionist because you provide to leads to your agents. If you had massive traffic to your company you need someone to answer the phone and pass out the leads. Don’t get me wrong… I don’t live off those leads because I am proactive and type A personality… but… they are nice when handed over… excuse any typos no time to proof read.. have a great day

  4. Bill Apr 5, 2010

    Matt,

    Technology and tools can be very well applied! Enjoy your boat, I do. Bill

    • Matt Jones Apr 5, 2010

      I love my boat! (s) I have two. A sailboat (that you see in my picture) and a Boston Whaler that I use to run around the Wrightsville, NC coastline. It is very cool. Of course the tools give me the ability to have the boats! Thanks for reading and for your post!

  5. Sean Goerss Apr 5, 2010

    Matt, I’m totally with you on this. Front desks also become a big time-waster for less productive agents. Just like break rooms, water coolers, and coffee makers. Get ride of em all!

    Oh, and to answer Laura’s comment about big brokerages – regular floor time STILL doesn’t make the most sense from a profit-perspective of the Broker. If the broker is giving leads over to the less successful agents, who are not generating the leads in the first place, and who have a WORSE conversion ratio on leads, then long-term the broker is going to be less efficient.

    If they are the only game in town, and nobody wises up to how much more efficient they can be at converting the leads, then great. BUT, if an efficient small brokerage, or big team steps into that market, watch out – I’ve seen it happen over a period of 5 years here in our market, and the “big name” brokerage with 60+ agents is now in a little office space next to the pasta buffet. :)

    • Matt Jones Apr 6, 2010

      Sean and Courtney,

      Thanks for reading, and for your input. It is always good for the other readers to know it’s not just some weird idea from some weird guy! :) Our industry is going through a major transformation and consolidation and those of us who are willing to question the status quo and make changes and get leaner will survive the tough times and thrive when things turn around. Thanks again for sharing!

  6. Courtney Self Apr 6, 2010

    Having recently opened my own company on a budget a receptionist was a luxury I couldn’t afford. I instead wanted a support person who would not be bogged down or distracted by having to answer phones. Now, 18 months later, working without a receptionist has been fine. I am a small company (about 10 agents) but I plan to expand and s it’s worked so well without a receptionist I don’t plan to hire one when we open our next location this year.

  7. Randy Landis Apr 6, 2010

    Matt, I couldn’t agree more about this industries transformation. I first read an article more than 5 years ago about the dimise of the golden palaces (big box brokerages) and if I hadn’t made some very insightful changes, I too would no longer be in business. Without a receptionist for going on two years now, my company and agents have learned much by going back to the basics, employing technology, and REGAINING complete control over every aspect of the listing and sales transaction. No listing or closing coordinators, no staff. Agents are forced to learn tech, manage their own websites, and ultimately look like the best all around agent candidate to potential seller clients. An agent who is in total control gets more business. What a unique concept!

    For Laura ~ Even RE/MAX has had to make some major changes of late in order to survive…and it isn’t over yet!

  8. David Odum Apr 14, 2010

    Matt,
    I agree with you about the receptionist, if all they do is answer the phone and greet.The agent that has floor duty that portion of the day can and should do that. I have worked in Brokerages that had no receptionists and one that just had a phone answerer. No was better. Where I am now the receptionist must also do things like upload ,MLS listings,pictures,virtual tours,handle all advertiseing. Fax documents to other agents,receive documents and file them.Get yards mowed and homes winterized when vacant.Send flowers when an agent or family member is sick or has passed.This is the best situation I have worked in as I rarely have to go to the office and can spend my time generating business.A phone call is all that is needed.Under this system,I have more than doubled my take home.We have four offices and about 70 agents.Imagine the brokers take home with support people in four offices, getting around 100,000 total, and most agents doubling their production and less turn over. Money well spent is money saved.
    I enjoy your emails,keep up the good work.
    David

  9. old time agent Apr 14, 2010

    Sounds more like you had a bad experience with high turnover. That is a management and recruiting problem. The front desk position can cover many functions and be a real asset to the office. This person can be a bookkeeper, tech support and more. And maybe if you paid a little more you might get better people who have more to offer and are willing to stay. Sometimes you get what you pay for.

    • Matt Jones Apr 14, 2010

      Thank you guys for reading and for your comments. We operate a virtual model so we have no place for a receptionist in our model. That having been said, I believe you do get what you pay for, but I can also tell you of hundreds of brokers who have the same high-turnover at the receptionist desk. It is probably because being a receptionist is the office equivalent to working at McDonald’s. Sometimes it’s not “you get what you pay for” but rather “you pay for what you get”. Thanks again for reading.

  10. Amy Apr 23, 2010

    Sean and Courtney,

    Thanks for reading, and for your input. It is always good for the other readers to know it’s not just some weird idea from some weird guy! :) Our industry is going through a major transformation and consolidation and those of us who are willing to question the status quo and make changes and get leaner will survive the tough times and thrive when things turn around. Thanks again for sharing!

  11. Robin Apr 25, 2010

    There is company out here that has a male receptionist and he is great. Unfortunately he is not at my company. Though I agree with your concept of a receptionist I don’t think it applies to all companies. Here at our Re/Max our company is huge and we attract buyer’s & seller’s from all over the world. They aren’t contacting one agent., they want a Re/Max agent. A receptionist is there to answer the phones and walk in leads that come in. Whoever is on floor gets the lead. I don’t want to knock you but I’m thinking you don’t need a receptionist because you provide to leads to your agents. If you had massive traffic to your company you need someone to answer the phone and pass out the leads. Don’t get me wrong… I don’t live off those leads because I am proactive and type A personality… but… they are nice when handed over… excuse any typos no time to proof read.. have a great day

  12. Brad Apr 25, 2010

    I may have started something here! Oh no!

Trackbacks

  1. Tweets that mention Max-Bang Series: Fire Your Receptionist! « Blog, Matt. Blog! -- Topsy.com